The concept that a Company is a legal person is the cornerstone of corporate law. It means that once a company is incorporated, it becomes an artificial person in the eyes of the law, distinct and separate from its members, shareholders, and directors.
1. Characteristics of a Separate Legal Entity
As a legal person, a company enjoys several rights similar to a natural person:
Independent Existence: The company's life is not tied to its members.
Right to Property: It can own, sell, and transfer property in its own name.
Right to Sue: It can sue others and be sued in a court of law.
Perpetual Succession: Members may come and go, but the company survives until it is legally dissolved.
Limited Liability: The debts of the company are its own; shareholders are generally only liable for the unpaid value of their shares.
2. Leading Case Laws
A. Salomon v. A. Salomon & Co. Ltd. (1897)
This is the most famous case establishing this principle.
Facts: Mr. Salomon was a successful boot manufacturer. He formed a limited company and sold his business to it. He, his wife, and five children were the shareholders. Salomon held 20,001 shares and 10,000 in debentures (secured debt). When the company faced financial trouble and went into liquidation, the unsecured creditors argued that the company was a "sham" and that Salomon and the company were the same person.
Ruling: The House of Lords held that once the company is legally incorporated, it must be treated as a separate legal entity, even if one person holds almost all the shares. Salomon, as a secured creditor, was entitled to be paid before the unsecured creditors.
B. Lee v. Lee’s Air Farming Ltd. (1961)
Facts: Lee formed a company for aerial top-dressing. He held 2,999 out of 3,000 shares and was the Managing Director. He was also the company’s chief pilot. Lee died in a plane crash while working. His wife claimed compensation under the Workers' Compensation Act. The company argued Lee couldn't be a "worker" because he was the owner/employer.
Ruling: The Privy Council held that Lee and the company were two distinct legal entities. Therefore, Lee could be a director and an employee at the same time. His widow was entitled to the compensation.
C. Macaura v. Northern Assurance Co. Ltd. (1925)
Facts: Macaura owned a timber estate and sold all the timber to a company in which he held all the shares. He insured the timber in his own name, not the company's name. When the timber was destroyed by fire, he claimed the insurance money.
Ruling: The court rejected the claim. It held that the timber belonged to the company (the legal person), not Macaura. Since Macaura did not have an "insurable interest" in the company’s property, he could not claim the insurance.
3. The "Veil" of Incorporation
The legal separation between the company and its members is often called the Corporate Veil.
While the law strictly upholds the separate personality (as seen in the cases above), there are instances where the "veil is lifted." If the corporate personality is used for fraud, tax evasion, or to circumvent legal obligations, the courts will ignore the separate entity and hold the individuals behind the company personally liable.
Summary of Leading Case Laws
| Case Law | Key Principle Established |
| Salomon v. Salomon | A company is a separate person from its shareholders. |
| Lee v. Lee's Air Farming | A person can be a director and an employee of the same company. |
| Macaura v. Northern Assurance | Shareholder has no legal interest in the company's property. |
No comments:
Post a Comment