The concept of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a proactive tool designed to evaluate the potential environmental consequences of a proposed project before it is initiated.
1. Legislative Incorporation of EIA
The legislative foundation of EIA in India is rooted in the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
EIA Notification, 2006: This is the primary subordinate legislation.
It makes Prior Environmental Clearance (EC) mandatory for specific categories of projects. Category A: Requires clearance from the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC).
Category B: Requires clearance from the State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA).
Relevance to Hazardous Waste: The Schedule to the 2006 Notification explicitly includes projects that handle hazardous waste, such as:
Common Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs).
Chemical Fertilizers, Pesticides, and Petrochemical industries.
Metallurgical industries (Toxic and heavy metal producing units).
Procedural Stages: The legislative process involves four stages: Screening (deciding if EIA is needed), Scoping (identifying key impacts), Public Consultation (addressing local concerns), and Appraisal (final review by experts).
2. Control of Hazardous Waste through EIA
Legislatively, the EIA process forces an industry to account for the "cradle-to-grave" management of hazardous waste:
Waste Quantification: Proponents must estimate the quantity and nature of waste (solid, liquid, or gaseous) to be generated.
Environmental Management Plan (EMP): A mandatory part of the EIA report, the EMP must detail how hazardous waste will be neutralized, stored, or transported to a TSDF.
Site Suitability: EIA prevents the establishment of hazardous units in ecologically sensitive areas (e.g., near wetlands or heritage sites).
3. Judicial Application and Interpretation
The Indian Judiciary has played a transformative role in tightening EIA norms, especially concerning hazardous waste.
A. Rejection of "Ex Post Facto" (Retrospective) Clearance
A recurring judicial theme is that "Prior" means "Prior."
Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Rohit Prajapati (2020): The Supreme Court held that the concept of ex post facto (after-the-fact) environmental clearance is alien to environmental jurisprudence.
Industries cannot start operations and then seek an EIA to "regularize" their illegality. Vanashakti v. Union of India (2025): The Court recently quashed government circulars that allowed units to bypass prior EC by paying a penalty, reinforcing that environmental protection cannot be reduced to a "penalty system."
B. The Precautionary Principle and TSDFs
In cases involving hazardous waste disposal sites, the Courts apply the Precautionary Principle.
Research Foundation for Science v. Union of India (2005): The Supreme Court monitored the management of hazardous waste across India, ruling that no hazardous unit can operate without a valid Authorization from the Pollution Control Board, which is itself contingent on a proper EIA/EC.
Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v. Union of India: While focused on tanneries, this case established that the "Polluter Pays" and "Precautionary" principles are part of the law of the land, making EIA a constitutional necessity under Article 21.
C. Public Participation as a Fundamental Right
The Judiciary views the "Public Hearing" stage of EIA as a vital democratic check. In cases like Lafarge Umiam Mining, the Court emphasized that a flawed public consultation process can lead to the revocation of the Environmental Clearance, especially if the project involves toxic risks to the local community.
No comments:
Post a Comment