The Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) system refers to a set of mechanisms and techniques that allow parties to resolve their legal disputes without proceeding to a full-scale, traditional trial in a court of law. It serves as an alternative to the formal "litigation" process, which is often criticized for being adversarial, expensive, and time-consuming.
1. Meaning of ADR
In its simplest form, ADR is a method of settling disputes with the assistance of a neutral third party. In India, the legal foundation for ADR is primarily found in Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908, which empowers courts to refer disputes to ADR modes if there appear to be elements of a settlement.
The system encompasses various processes—ranging from highly structured arbitration to informal negotiation—designed to provide "access to justice" in a way that is more flexible than the rigid procedures of a civil court.
2. Nature of the ADR System
The nature of ADR can be characterized by several distinct features:
Voluntary and Consensual: ADR is largely based on the consent of the parties. For instance, Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, mandates that an arbitration agreement must be in writing and reflects the mutual intention of the parties.
Informality: Unlike courts, ADR forums are not bound by the strict, technical rules of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 or the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. This is explicitly stated in Section 19 of the 1996 Act.
Confidentiality: ADR proceedings are private. Under Section 75, all matters relating to conciliation proceedings must be kept confidential, protecting business secrets and personal reputations.
Non-Adversarial: While arbitration remains somewhat adversarial, modes like mediation and conciliation focus on a "win-win" outcome rather than identifying a "winner" and a "loser."
Finality: Decisions in certain ADR modes, such as an arbitral award under Section 35, are final and binding, with very limited scope for judicial interference.
3. Various Techniques of ADR
The ADR system is a broad umbrella containing several specific techniques. Each technique differs in the level of control the parties retain and the authority of the third party.
A. Arbitration
Arbitration is the most formal ADR technique. It involves submitting a dispute to one or more neutral persons (arbitrators) who render a binding decision called an "award."
Key Feature: The decision is enforceable as a court decree under Section 36 of the 1996 Act.
Usage: Commonly used in complex commercial, construction, and international trade disputes.
B. Conciliation
Conciliation is a process where a neutral third party (the conciliator) helps the parties reach an amicable settlement by proactively suggesting potential solutions.
Key Feature: Under Section 67, the conciliator assists in an independent and impartial manner. If a settlement is reached and signed, it has the status of an arbitral award under Section 74.
C. Mediation
Mediation is a purely facilitative process. The mediator does not judge the case or suggest solutions but helps the parties communicate more effectively so they can find their own resolution.
Key Feature: The parties retain total control over the outcome. It is often used in matrimonial disputes and corporate deadlocks.
D. Lok Adalat (People’s Court)
Lok Adalats are a uniquely Indian ADR forum designed for the quick settlement of pending or pre-litigation cases through compromise.
Key Reference: Regulated under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. The award is final and no appeal lies against it.
E. Negotiation
Negotiation is the most basic and informal ADR technique. It involves direct communication between the parties (or their representatives) to reach a compromise without the intervention of any third party.
No comments:
Post a Comment