The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was enacted to provide a modern, efficient, and less formal alternative to the traditional court system. Its primary goal is to encourage the settlement of disputes through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) methods, thereby reducing the burden on the judiciary.
The objectives of the Act, as derived from its Preamble and various provisions, include:
1. Objects of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
The "objects" or purposes of the Act are outlined in its Preamble and have been further clarified by the Supreme Court of India. The main objectives are:
Modernization & Consolidation: To unify the law relating to domestic arbitration, international commercial arbitration, and the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards into a single statute.
Minimal Judicial Intervention: One of the most critical objects is to limit the role of courts. Section 5 explicitly states that no judicial authority shall intervene except where specifically provided by the Act.
Enforceability: To ensure that an arbitral award is enforced in the same manner as a decree of a civil court (Section 36), giving it "teeth" comparable to a judge's verdict.
Efficiency and Speed: To provide a time-bound mechanism for resolving disputes. Recent amendments (like Section 29A) mandate that awards in domestic cases must be delivered within 12 months.
Reasoned Awards: To require that arbitral tribunals provide reasons for their decisions (Section 31), ensuring transparency and fairness.
Promotion of Conciliation: Unlike the previous law, this Act provides a detailed statutory framework for Conciliation (Part III), giving settlement agreements the same legal status as an arbitral award.
Main Objects at a Glance
| Objective | Legal Basis / Mechanism |
| Uniformity | Adoption of UNCITRAL Model Law. |
| Speed | Time-bound awards under Section 29A. |
| Autonomy | Freedom to choose rules, language, and venue. |
| Binding Nature | Award is a "Deemed Decree" under Section 36. |
| Alternative to Court | Section 8 mandates courts to refer parties to arbitration. |
2. Role of UNCITRAL in the 1996 Act
The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) played the role of a "blueprint provider" for the Indian Act.
The relationship can be broken down into three key aspects:
A. The Basis of the Law
The 1996 Act is almost entirely based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985) and the UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules (1980).
B. Harmonization and Uniformity
The primary role of UNCITRAL is to harmonize international trade laws so that a business in India and a business in Germany follow the same "rules of the game." By following the UNCITRAL model:
Indian awards became more easily recognizable and enforceable abroad.
Foreign investors felt more confident, knowing that Indian arbitration procedures mirrored those they used globally.
C. Interpretational Guidance
Because the Act is based on a global model, Indian courts often look at international commentaries and foreign court decisions (from other UNCITRAL-adopting countries like the UK or Singapore) to interpret sections of the Indian Act. This prevents the law from becoming "isolated" and ensures it stays evolved with international commercial practices.
| Aspect | Contribution of UNCITRAL |
| Structure | Provided the "Part-based" structure (Domestic vs. International). |
| Principles | Introduced the principle of Kompetenz-Kompetenz (Tribunal's power to rule on its own jurisdiction). |
| Conciliation | Provided the rules that form Part III of the Indian Act. |
| Consistency | Ensured that "Public Policy" grounds for challenging awards are interpreted narrowly. |
No comments:
Post a Comment